You'd probably scan in the photos at the highest resolution and color depth your scanner can do. But these might not be the same files you originally captured. It is useful to have individual files to share with other people. But when do you need to? Browsing through them? Printing them out? You don't need them in individual files for that. You can create individual files when you need to. Have been a super easy device to manufacture. Simple roller/sheet feeder (er, photo feeder) would Would have thought a 1/3rd size scanner with a Would like some help finding a solution here. I'm in the same boat as the original poster. He scanned a total ofĪbout 50 pictures (with my equipment) then gave Spend some of his afternoons scanning them in,Īt a rate of $0.25/photo. I tried to get my grade-school aged nephew to Having them as separate files seems like it shouldīe a little more manageable than several shoeboxes It's been too long to accurately date many of them Older pictures are more interesting by far. I also have a zillion or so negatives from
"older" photos that I am interested in digitizing. I have aboutĢ000 photos with no negatives which are my
My 600 dpi flatbed scanner isĪ trooper for sure, but 4 pictures at a time is Like the original poster, I've had this same taskįor a long time. Occasion that I did, I did not see any in theĪt this point I wouldn't mind a build-it-yourself I have not checked ebay today, but on the rare
0 kommentar(er)
